Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

What Gingrich's Freddie Mac Ties Mean for Voters What Gingrich's Freddie Mac Ties Mean for Voters

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

What Gingrich's Freddie Mac Ties Mean for Voters

+

Republican presidential candidates former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney, left, and former House Speaker Newt Gingrich gesture during a Republican presidential debate Monday Jan. 23, 2012, at the University of South Florida in Tampa, Fla.(AP Photo/Paul Sancya)

Newt Gingrich says he never lobbied for Freddie Mac and under the law's narrow definition of lobbying, that may be true. But a contract released Monday by Gingrich's former consulting firm may give voters, who have a much broader, common-sense understanding of lobbying, pause. 
The contract shows that the mortgage giant paid Gingrich $25,000 a month in 2006 to provide what he has called "strategic advice" to one of Freddie Mac's top lobbyists. And a clause requiring his firm to "perform services under this agreement in a highly professional manner consistent with the quality provided by other top firms providing comparable services in Washington" casts doubt on his original explanation that he was acting as a historian. Similar firms are generally not being hired for the historians they have on staff.
The contract leaves room for Gingrich to provide lobbying advice and strategy to one of Freddie Mac's top lobbyists, which is standard operating procedural among a number of former members of Congress who join Washington lobbying shops and don't regularly lobby members or staff themselves. It also leaves open the possibility of advising the mortgage giant on everything from legislative procedure to the personality dynamics driving a legislative debate. 
An investigation by the New York Times last year found that Gingrich's role was to defend Freddie Mac from conservatives who wanted to take the mortgage giant apart. 
Mitt Romney and his backers have attacked Gingrich for not being transparent about his relationship with Freddie Mac, which played a central role in the housing crisis. And Monday's disclosure did little to reveal what Gingrich did there. And it certainly did not put the issue to rest for Romney, who took another shot at Gingrich early in Monday night's debate. 
"His contract with Freddie Mac was provided by the lobbyist of Freddie Mac," he said.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories

Excellent!"

Rick, Executive Director for Policy

Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."

Chuck, Graduate Student

The day's action in one quick read."

Stacy, Director of Communications

I find them informative and appreciate the daily news updates and enjoy the humor as well."

Richard, VP of Government Affairs

Chock full of usable information on today's issues. "

Michael, Executive Director

Sign up form for the newsletter
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL