Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Lobbying Showdown on EPA Coal Rules Divides Industry Lobbying Showdown on EPA Coal Rules Divides Industry

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

Blogs

Lobbying Showdown on EPA Coal Rules Divides Industry

December 7, 2011
My colleague Amy Harder has a look at how the EPA's new mercury standards are dividing energy industry lobbyists. 

She reports for members: 

On Dec. 16, EPA plans to finalize its mercury standards for the nation's 1,200 coal-fired power plants and 150 oil-burning units. Coal will be hit the hardest because it is the dirtiest form of energy (though it's also the cheapest and provides nearly half of America's electricity). Current law says all companies must comply with the rule by 2015. The fight has boiled down to whether EPA should announce it will give all companies more time to comply at the same time it publishes the rule this month, or whether the agency should decide on a case-by-case basis what individual companies need more time depending on the circumstances at any particular power plant. ...

In Washington-speak, that basically means this: If you support EPA's current timeline for complying with the rule, you're supporting public health but not a strong economy, and dismissing concerns about widespread grid-reliability problems. If you don't support EPA's current timeline, you're supporting a strong economy and grid reliability but not public health. Utilities don't fit neatly into either position. ... 

Washington's polarizing gap was on display at a debate this summer between pairs of lobbyists representing each side: Jeff Holmstead and Scott Segal of Bracewell & Giuliani, which represents coal-fired utilities like Southern Company, Progress Energy, and Duke Energy, versus Michael Bradley, executive director of the Clean Energy Group (which includes cleaner-burning utility companies like Constellation and NextEra Energy), and John Walke, director of the Natural Resources Defense Council's Clean Air Program. ... Other key players include Tom Kuhn, president of the Edison Electric Institute, whose member companies range from cleaner-burning utilities to coal companies; and Fred Krupp, president of the Environmental Defense Fund, which has been lobbying utility CEOs to support the rule and its current timeline.
More Blogs
Job Board
Search Jobs
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Product Manager - Chemical Development and Supply - Tulsa, OK
American Society of Civil Engineers | Tulsa, OK
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Business Development Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
Comments
comments powered by Disqus