McMahon Expected To Land Knockout Blow Against Shays

When he entered the Connecticut Senate race, it looked like former Rep. Chris Shays would be able to give Linda McMahon a run for her money. McMahon, after all, had spent $50 million of her own money for her 2010 campaign -- and lost decisively in a GOP wave election.

But heading into Tuesday's primary, she's the heavy favorite to again be the Republican nominee in the Nutmeg State. On the Democratic side, Rep. Chris Murphy holds a lead in his primary contest with former Secretary of State Susan Bysiewicz, and is expected to be the nominee. Bysiewicz simply never caught fire against the establishment-favored Murphy: He has out-raised and out-polled her by significant margins throughout the campaign, and she never really registered as a serious threat to his frontrunner status.

In March, it seemed like Shays might register as a threat to McMahon. A Quinnipiac poll showed him to be a much better general election candidate than his opponent. Shays tied Murphy or Bysiewicz in potential matchups, while McMahon lagged both by double digits. But McMahon was well ahead of Shays in primary matchups, and he has proved unable to turn an electability argument into gains against the 2010 nominee.

One reason? Money, both hers and his lack of money. Shays never managed to raise the necessary funds to go on television and raise his profile. As an outspoken campaign finance reformer when in Congress, he didn't have my obvious fundraising avenues. And his moderate record isn't an asset when it comes to raising money from ideological allies. Meanwhile, McMahon hasn't self-funded at the level of her 2010 run yet, but she has dumped $12.4 million into her campaign already this cycle.

Though Shays didn't go after McMahon on television, he has not minced words when discussing his opponent -- and there is no love lost between the two candidates. Shays has said he wouldn't support her if she won the primary, and told the New Haven Register, "I have never run against an opponent that I have respected less -- ever -- and there are a lot of candidates I have run against."

The former World Wrestling Entertainment CEO has tried to soften her image this time around, talking extensively to women and emphasizing her humble roots. She has also made an attempt at a "grassroots" campaign -- and though she's raised little money in addition to her contributions, last time she didn't make the same effort at outreach.

Shays, who served in the House for over 21 years, also has a moderate record that doesn't make him a favorite with the state's GOP primary electorate. During his tenure, for example, he voted for minimum wage increases, spoke out against the Bush administration's handling of the Iraq war and refused to accept money from outside Republican groups, promoting a "good-government" image. The electability argument has become harder for him to make recently, as the race dynamics shifted. Another Quinnipiac poll released in June showed McMahon running better than Shays against Murphy. McMahon has significant baggage from her time as WWE CEO, and in the general election we can expect Democrats to once again run ads similar to two years ago, hitting her on the company's practices and treatment of wrestlers. Murphy previewed the attacks this weekend on WFSB-TV's "Face the State. Discussing the industries he's raised money from, he said, "Not all of us are Linda McMahon. Not all of us can make money off selling violence and making fun of the vulnerable to kids." McMahon has also already shifted her focus to the general election battle, and is running a television ad attacking Murphy for saying his jobs plan is a "work in progress." Assuming he wins, Murphy would start the general election as the favorite. President Obama is expected to win the presidential race in the Democratic-leaning state, and McMahon would likely have to run well ahead of Mitt Romney -- her campaign sought distance after his vice presidential pick of Paul Ryan, with McMahon's spokesperson Corry Bliss saying that "Linda McMahon will never support a budget that cuts Medicare." But given McMahon's huge capacity to self-fund and her carefully re-crafted image, there remains the possibility that this race will become one to watch this fall.

Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
About

Staff


Reid Wilson, Editor-in-Chief
Steve Shepard, Executive Editor
Julie Sobel, Editor
Kevin Brennan, Deputy Editor


Disclaimer


On Call editors reserve the right to delete inappropriate comments. The Hotline, National Journal Group, Inc. and Atlantic Media Company are not responsible for the content of the comments that remain.