Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

McKenna Enjoys Perks of Office McKenna Enjoys Perks of Office

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


McKenna Enjoys Perks of Office

"I think it's problematic that it's the attorney general who is the one who is supposed to be making the decision as to what happens next," said Lori Anderson, a spokeswoman for the disclosure commission, adding that McKenna seemed to be "trying to force" the commission to make a ruling before the election. However, she noted that the commission's hands are tied. There is nothing they can do about the complaint until it has been forwarded to them -- from McKenna's office. "While it's a problem, it's not our problem," she said. Of course, Inslee could have done the same thing McKenna did; a citizen action is exactly what it sounds like -- it can be filed by anyone. But it's hard to see the attorney general's office - or his allies in King County - rushing to forward a complaint about the attorney general himself. Instead, they could allow the forty-five-day time limit, and a subsequent 10-day final notice period, to expire without making any decision on it at all. That would Inslee's campaign with the option of either abandoning the complaint or filing a lawsuit themselves. Whatever Inslee spent on the suit could be reimbursed by the state -- but only if he won. However, Anderson says situations like those, though possible, are extremely rare and the attorney general almost always passes disclosure complaints along to the commission. Once the commission makes a ruling, one of two things can happen: it can file charges or pass the case back to the Attorney General either because the commission found no evidence of wrongdoing, or because the case is too big for their office to handle. In either case the attorney general's office or the King County prosecutor can still pursue charges. "We followed the process that's set in place," McKenna's communications director Charles McCray told reporters on a conference call on Friday. As for a conflict of interest, McCray said that while he couldn't speak for the attorney general's office, he would "imagine" that they would bring in outside counsel or hand the case over to another agency. Whatever happens, McCray insisted that the McKenna campaign is intent on going forward with the case. "We are certainly prepared, if need be, to pursue this," he said. The process is a win-win for McKenna. The disclosure commission must make a decision by October 7 (or the 17th at the latest given a 10-day final notice period), less than a month before the election. And should he be unhappy with the results, his own office has the power to file and pursue charges against Inslee's campaign anyway. Of course the former case -- having an outside group label Inslee's campaign tactics inappropriate - would be an ideal scenario. But should the PDC reject McKenna's complaint, his campaign can easily spin a lawsuit as just another action against wrongdoing by a strong attorney general standing up for the law.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories


Rick, Executive Director for Policy

Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."

Chuck, Graduate Student

The day's action in one quick read."

Stacy, Director of Communications

I find them informative and appreciate the daily news updates and enjoy the humor as well."

Richard, VP of Government Affairs

Chock full of usable information on today's issues. "

Michael, Executive Director

Sign up form for the newsletter