Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

A Primary Isn't Always A Bad Thing A Primary Isn't Always A Bad Thing

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member or subscriber? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

A Primary Isn't Always A Bad Thing

Democrats frequently point to New Mexico, where former Rep. Heather Wilson, who many conservatives despise, is running against Lt. Gov. John Sanchez, who is tacking to her right. If Wilson survives a rough primary, it's an opportunity to coalesce support from the right and middle of the GOP electorate. And Sanchez, a Hispanic Republican statewide officeholder, has potential appeal as well. Wisconsin is a state where a nasty, tea party versus establishment primary is already brewing on the GOP side. But one could also argue that the almost-certain Democratic nominee, Rep. Tammy Baldwin, could have benefited from a primary. Would it have been the worst thing in the world if Rep. Ron Kind, a more moderate lawmaker from the western part of the state, had run against her? If she would have beaten him, she'd have proved an ability to win over moderates outside of the liberal enclave of Madison. Had she lost, perhaps she was not the best nominee in the first place. One reason pundits point out primaries are costly is because they can force a frontrunner to spend valuable money before the general election. After all, the argument goes, if a candidate has to spend millions fending off a nuisance opponent, the campaign's warchest could be depleted by the time the fall rolls around. That's true -- to an extent. But when talking about the handful of swing-state races where control of the Senate will be decided, the powerful Super PACs and other outside groups could rival spending from candidates in some cases. In other words, even if a candidate ends up having to overspend in the primary, if the general election race is within reach, the money from allies will be there. Heeding the lessons of 2012, national Republicans are not using a heavy hand when it comes to endorsements. But that may be a distinction without a difference, because in many races, it is clear who the implied National Republican Senatorial Committee favorite is. National Democrats, on the other hand, have been actively endorsing. For her own part, Murray drew a contrast on Tuesday between contested GOP primaries' and contested Democratic primaries. But in Arizona, Don Bivens has been blasting DSCC-favored Richard Carmona as a D.C.-handpicked candidate. In Connecticut, Susan Bysiewicz isn't going to just let Rep. Chris Murphy march to the nomination. Overall, there's real risk in allowing candidates with unproven track records statewide to coast until the late fall, when it may be too late to correct their flaws. Primaries, while often bloody, nasty affairs, mean those flaws will be addressed earlier rather than later.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories

Excellent!"

Rick, Executive Director for Policy

Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."

Chuck, Graduate Student

The day's action in one quick read."

Stacy, Director of Communications

I find them informative and appreciate the daily news updates and enjoy the humor as well."

Richard, VP of Government Affairs

Chock full of usable information on today's issues. "

Michael, Executive Director

Sign up form for the newsletter
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL
 
 
Make your Election Night headquarters.
See more ▲
 
Hide