Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Insiders Disagree On Security, Tone Of Rhetoric Insiders Disagree On Security, Tone Of Rhetoric

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

Insiders Disagree On Security, Tone Of Rhetoric

But while they did not differ that much on the question of security, the Congressional Insiders had very different views on the state of political discourse. Asked to characterize the quality of political discourse these days, fully half of the Democrats said that it was "terrible." Another 38 percent said that it was "poor." Republicans, by contrast, were much less discouraged. Only a sliver, seven percent, said it was "terrible." Almost a quarter said it was "good."

The partisan division is not surprising. Many Republicans have bristled at suggestions in the media that the harsh rhetoric that has been aimed at Pres. Obama and accompanied the public debate somehow motivated gunman Jared Loughner. A Democratic Insider who described the political discourse as poor said, "The tone of certitude on issues and the dehumanization of opponents are not only unproductive, but dangerous." A skeptical Republican Insider said bluntly, "What does this question have to do with the Arizona shooting?"

Don\'t Miss Today\'s

Chock full of usable information on today's issues."

Michael, Executive Director

Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."

Chuck, Graduate Student

The day's action in one quick read."

Stacy , Director of Communications

Great way to keep up with Washington"

Ray, Professor of Economics

Sign up form for the newsletter
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL