Campaign analysis by the most interesting thinkers in Washington

Why the Health Care Decision Means More Conflict in the States

Protesters with tape across their mouths reading "LIFE" stand silent outside the Supreme Court.  (Chet Susslin)

One aspect of the Supreme Court's decision largely upholding President Obama's health care reform law seems likely to heighten the political argument over the plan in the states.

While upholding the individual mandate at the law's core, the five-member majority led by Chief Justice John Roberts struck down one aspect of the law's expansion of Medicaid, the joint federal-state program providing health insurance for the poor. In so doing the Court virtually guaranteed sharper debate in the states, especially Republican-leaning red states, over whether to join the program the law establishes to expand Medicaid eligibility and coverage.

Those decisions will carry substantial stakes. Many of the conservative states most likely to opt out of the Medicaid expansion are also among the states with the largest number of uninsured. National Journal has calculated that the 26 states that joined the lawsuit against the Medicaid expansion contain 27.6 million uninsured, a 55 percent majority of all the uninsured in America, according to Census Bureau figures. That includes Texas at 6.1 million uninsured, Florida at 3.9 million, and Georgia at 1.9 million.

The health care law required states to expand eligibility for Medicaid to all residents earning below 133 percent of the poverty line. That expansion was expected to provide coverage to about 17 million of the uninsured, roughly half of the total coverage expansion projected under the law. (The mandate on individuals to buy insurance, with substantial subsidies from the government and the establishment of exchanges where they can shop for competing coverage plans, is expected to provide the other half.)


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Decoded Contributors
Tim Alberta

Tim Alberta

Editor, Hotline Last Call!

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Caren Bohan

Caren Bohan

Managing Editor for Domestic Policy

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Ronald Brownstein

Ronald Brownstein

Editorial Director

Decoded Posts | All Stories


George E. Condon Jr.

George E. Condon Jr.

Staff Writer, White House

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Matthew Cooper

Matthew Cooper

Editor, National Journal Daily

Decoded Posts | All Stories


John Aloysius Farrell

John Aloysius Farrell

Congressional Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Ron Fournier

Ron Fournier

Editor-in-Chief

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Chris Frates

Chris Frates

Lobbying Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Major Garrett

Major Garrett

Congress Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Shane Goldmacher

Shane Goldmacher

Congressional Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Michael Hirsh

Michael Hirsh

Chief Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Jackie Koszczuk

Jackie Koszczuk

Editor, The Almanac of American Politics

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Josh Kraushaar

Josh Kraushaar

Executive Editor, The Hotline

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Jill Lawrence

Jill Lawrence

Managing Editor, Politics

Decoded Posts | All Stories


James Oliphant

James Oliphant

Deputy Magazine Editor

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Beth Reinhard

Beth Reinhard

Political Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Storie


Alex Roarty

Alex Roarty

Staff Writer, Politics

Decoded posts | All Stories


Lori Santos

Lori Santos

Managing Editor, Breaking News

Decoded posts | All Stories


Jim Tankersley

Jim Tankersley

Economics Correspondent

Decoded Posts | All Stories


Reid Wilson

Reid Wilson

Editor-In-Chief, The Hotline

Decoded Posts | All Stories