Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Martha Coakley's Comeback Martha Coakley's Comeback

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Martha Coakley's Comeback


Democratic candidate for the U.S. Senate seat, Martha Coakley, bows her head in defeat at the Sheraton in Boston, Massachusetts on January 19, 2010. Coakley is running against Repubulican State Senator Scott Brown in a special election to fill the U.S. Senate seat left empty by the death of Sen. Edward M. Kennedy, D-Mass. (UPI/Ryan T. Conaty)

In January 2010, Martha Coakley's gaffe-filled loss to Scott Brown in the Massachusetts special election to replace Ted Kennedy marked one of the most humiliating moments for Democrats in the Obama era. Her defeat presaged the GOP takeover of the House later that year and the stranglehold that tea party politics has had on national policymaking in the last two years.

But Coakley's looking pretty good since then, making me wonder: has she been more effective from Massachusetts than she would have been from Washington? Even as all the attention has been focused on  Elizabeth Warren, the consumer-finance firebrand who is in a tight Senate race with Brown, Coakley has quietly built up an impressive record as attorney general in Massachusetts. Coakley has been one of the few holdouts to resist a deal desperately sought by the major banks over documentation fraud and other past abuses. More than 40 states have already agreed to a settlement said to be worth as much as $25 billion, but Coakley may be paying heed to advocates who say the deal is a cave-in and she should reserve her right to sue.  Indeed, Coakley has launched what is considered the most  comprehensive lawsuit in the nation over unfair and deceptive business practices. The Boston Globe recently called her "a national leader on behalf of homeowners caught up in the long-running housing crisis."

Under the legal theory being used by Coakley, the big Wall Street banks can and should be held accountable for the nonbanks that have been central figures in documentation fraud. According to Kathleen Engel of Suffolk University Law School, the documentation scandal that has cropped up in the last year or so--raising doubts about whether investment trusts ever obtained proper ownership of many of the loans and whether they can foreclose on mortgages--can be used to pin liability on these "vertically integrated" Wall Street giants and cost them some serious money in fines.

Don't Miss Today's Top Stories


Rick, Executive Director for Policy

Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."

Chuck, Graduate Student

The day's action in one quick read."

Stacy, Director of Communications

I find them informative and appreciate the daily news updates and enjoy the humor as well."

Richard, VP of Government Affairs

Chock full of usable information on today's issues. "

Michael, Executive Director

Sign up form for the newsletter