Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

South Carolina Debate: So, How Did They Do? South Carolina Debate: So, How Did They Do?

NEXT :
This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation

 

South Carolina Debate: So, How Did They Do?

Newt Gingrich's full blame-the-media strategy on the "open marriage" question seemed to work. His opponents were subdued. The audience was enthusiastic. But Rick Santorum's implication that he was a delusional egomaniac might have gotten more traction. If Gingrich is surging in South Carolina, he might still be.

Santorum seemed to adopt a Southern accent at times. He seemed calm, less unctuous than in past debates and he managed to prick Mitt Romney and Gingrich without seeming to be mean. He seemed the most connected to working families and the harshest on illegal immigrants.

Ron Paul was Ron Paul, focused and single-minded and probably more likable than the other three. Despite South Carolina's dependence on the military, he didn't take that much grief for his come-home-America message.

Romney seemed strangely unprepared for the tax question, nervously laughing and obfuscating. Otherwise he seemed fine, ready and robotic -- which is what got him to where he is now.

DON'T MISS TODAY'S TOP STORIES

Chock full of usable information on today's issues."

Michael, Executive Director

Concise coverage of everything I wish I had hours to read about."

Chuck, Graduate Student

The day's action in one quick read."

Stacy , Director of Communications

Great way to keep up with Washington"

Ray, Professor of Economics

Sign up form for the newsletter
MORE NATIONAL JOURNAL