Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Reveal Navigation

Why the NCAA Could Explain 2012 Why the NCAA Could Explain 2012 Why the NCAA Could Explain 2012 Why the NCAA Could Explai...

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Blogs / CAMPAIGN 2012

Why the NCAA Could Explain 2012

Arizona State and Ohio State composite(AP Photo Composite)

November 1, 2011

There's a growing sense among strategists in both parties that two distinct, even inverse, sets of swing states now hold the key to close presidential elections.

One set includes the traditional battlegrounds of American politics: the metal-bending behemoths of the Rust Belt like Ohio, Michigan, Pennsylvania and Wisconsin. These states tend to be older, preponderantly white, and stagnant or declining in population.

The emerging battlegrounds are their opposite: fast growing, diverse, generally younger states across the Sun Belt. Many of these states were solidly Republican in the 1990s, but have grown more competitive as their population has tilted more toward racial minorities and socially-moderate college-educated whites.

President Obama won most of both groups of states in 2008, but his path in 2012 looks much more challenging.

Get us in your feed.
More Blogs