
Rep. Anna Eshoo (D)
California, District 18Tools: Print | Reprints | Purchase the Almanac
| 1. Contact | 2. Staff | 3. Committees |
| 4. Biography | 5. Election Results | 6. Votes and Bills |
| Email: | Website: |
| n/a | eshoo.house.gov |
| DC Contact Information | State Office Contact Information |
| Phone: 202-225-8104 | Phone: (650) 323-2984 |
| Address: 241 CHOB, DC 20515 | Address: 698 Emerson Street, Palo Alto CA 94301-1609 |
Follow Anna Eshoo: facebook twitter youtube
| Elected: 1992, 11th term. |
| District: California, District 18 |
| Born: Dec. 13, 1942, New Britain, CT |
| Home: Menlo Park |
| Education: Canada Col., A.A. 1975 |
| Professional Career: Chmn., San Mateo Cnty. Dem. Party, 1980; Chief of staff, CA assembly speaker, 1981. |
| Political Career: San Mateo Cnty. Bd. of Supervisors, 1982–92, pres., 1986. |
| Ethnicity: White/Caucasian |
| Religion: Catholic |
| Family: Divorced; 2 children |
The congresswoman from the 14th District is Anna Eshoo, a Democrat first elected in 1992. Born in Connecticut, Eshoo (EH-shoo) is the only member of Congress of Assyrian descent. Her father, a jeweler and an FDR Democrat, sparked her interest in politics at a young age by taking her to political rallies. The family moved to California. Eshoo married and had two children, and for a while was a stay-at-home mother working on a degree in English literature. (She later divorced.) Eshoo was active in civic groups, then chaired the San Mateo County Democratic Party and in 1982 was elected to the San Mateo Board of Supervisors. In 1988, she ran for the U.S. House against incumbent Republican Tom Campbell. The two spent a total of $2.5 million. Campbell won 52%-46%. In 1992, Campbell gave up his seat to run for the Senate, and Eshoo again ran. In the primary, she beat Assemblyman Ted Lempert, who had strong backing from environmentalists but lost ground by making unsubstantiated attacks against Eshoo. She prevailed 40%-36%. In the general election, Eshoo had a tough contest against Republican Tom Huening, the San Mateo supervisor who was backed by David Packard and other Silicon Valley business leaders. But Eshoo won by a convincing 57%-39%. She has not had a serious challenge for re-election. Read More
| Eshoo Anna | Votes: 212,831 | Percent: 70.49% | |
| Chapman Dave | Votes: 89,103 | Percent: 29.51% | |
| Eshoo Anna | Votes: 86,851 | Percent: 61.46% | |
| Chapman Dave | Votes: 42,174 | Percent: 29.85% | |
2010 (69%), 2008 (70%), 2006 (71%), 2004 (70%), 2002 (68%), 2000 (70%), 1998 (69%), 1996 (65%), 1994 (61%), 1992 (57%)
National Journal’s rating system is an objective method of analyzing voting. The liberal score means that the lawmaker’s votes were more liberal than that percentage of his colleagues’ votes. The conservative score means his votes were more conservative than that percentage of his colleagues’ votes. The composite score is an average of a lawmaker’s six issue-based scores. See all NJ Voting
| 2012 | 2011 | 2010 | |
| Economic | 71 (L) : 28 (C) | 73 (L) : 27 (C) | 90 (L) : - (C) |
| Social | 81 (L) : 15 (C) | 80 (L) : - (C) | 89 (L) : 7 (C) |
| Foreign | 86 (L) : 13 (C) | 88 (L) : - (C) | 78 (L) : 17 (C) |
| Composite | 80.3 (L) : 19.7 (C) | 85.7 (L) : 14.3 (C) | 88.8 (L) : 11.2 (C) |
The vote ratings by 10 special interest groups provide insight into a lawmaker’s general ideology and the degree to which he or she agrees with the group’s point of view. Some organizations provide just one combined rating for 2009 and 2010, the two sessions of the 111th Congress. About the interest groups.
Key House Votes| Pass GOP budget | Vote: N | Year: 2012 |
| End fiscal cliff | Vote: Y | Year: 2012 |
| Extend payroll tax cut | Vote: Y | Year: 2012 |
| Find AG in contempt | Vote: N | Year: 2012 |
| Stop student loan hike | Vote: N | Year: 2012 |
Save List
Your saved lists will appear under My Saved Lists on The Almanac's landing page.
List Name

