ELECTION ANALYSIS

Will Text-Raising Become the Next Big Thing?

Newly legal pitch opens up a new front in the presidential race.

Updated: June 18, 2012 | 11:02 a.m.
June 18, 2012 | 6:00 a.m.

FILE - In this June 3, 2010 file photo, President Barack Obama uses his BlackBerry e-mail device as he walks at Sidwell Friends school in Bethesda, Md. Call him the Digital Candidate: President Barack Obama has asked supporters to use Facebook to declare “I’m in” for his re-election campaign and has begun using Twitter to communicate with his nearly 9 million followers. If Obama broke new ground using email, text messages and the Web to reach voters in 2008, Obama version 2.0 aims to harness the expansive roles that the Internet and social media are playing now in voters’ lives.    (AP Photo/Charles Dharapak, File)

About a decade ago, the Internet revolutionized political fundraising. Could text messages be poised to repeat the feat?

The Federal Election Commission’s decision last week to allow fundraising solicitations via text is a critical money-raising permutation for candidate scrambling for cash. And the newly legal pitch opens a new front in the battle between Mitt Romney and President Obama.

Which candidate best succeeds at incorporating the new fundraising tool will gain a possibly critical edge in a neck-and-neck presidential contest where every dollar raised and supporter mobilized is potentially crucial. Text-message solicitations have the potential to not only tap into a deep pool of small donors, political consultant from both parties say, but also cultivate a community of supporters who otherwise wouldn’t be involved in the race.

“It’s a sea change in campaign finance; at least it could be,” said Mark Armour, a Democratic strategist whose political consulting firm proposed the change to the FEC. “The challenge is to operationalize it.”

Raising money with text messages isn’t a new phenomenon outside of politics: After the devastating 2010 earthquake in Haiti, donors contributed tens of millions of dollars using the phone service. Everyday consumers use the technology to buy services on their smartphones: It amounts to about $2 billion in transactions annually, according to Alan Sege, vice president of m-Qube, a company that serves as a messaging and billing gateway for phone carriers.

The Obama campaign, for its part, used text messages in 2008 as a political organizing tool. With the FEC's ruling, the campaign now can ask thousands of supporters attending a rally to send money as well as help get out the vote.

The FEC had previously declined to allow campaigns to raise money with text messages, but reversed itself – at the behest of a coalition of political groups and the Romney and Obama campaigns -- after determining that the contributions can be verified as legal. Donors, who will remain anonymous, can contribute up to $50 per campaign using the phone service.

Through April, 44 percent of Obama’s contributions came from small donors giving around $200 or less, according to the Center for Competitive Politics. That’s compared to just 12 percent for Romney – although the presumed GOP presidential nominee did report that 93 percent of his contributors in May were small donors.

The advantage of text messaging, as opposed to other techniques like e-mail, is its ease of use. Campaign can ask people to send an amount they would wish to donate to five or six-digit code, and after receiving a text message back seeking confirmation, the donation can be processed and sent to the campaign. That’s easier, for example, than inputting credit card information on a website, and it explains why political operatives think it can attract a new class of donors.

“The bigger picture is, it’s an entirely new fundraising stream of millions of small, easy donations,” Armour said. “This is relatively frictionless, it’s quick, it’s easy, it’s also responsive.”

Carriers will subtract a fee for each donation, but the money could still add up quickly and substantially for each presidential campaign. How much money they receive, however, could hinge on how well either campaign deploys the new technique.

They won’t lack for ways to use it, according to GOP political strategist Vincent Harris.

“Obama will, in theory, be able to text his 1 million plus people and say, ‘Romney outraised us. Let's fight back. Text back a donation amount and you'll be billed,’” Harris said. “Or he'll be able to add a ‘short code’ number to text a donation amount into on the last 5 to 7 seconds of his TV ads.”

Weaving the text message solicitation into existing advertisements like TV ads highlights the core strength of the new technology, Armour argued.

“The beauty of the fundraising stream is that it uses existing marketing materials.” He said. “So every TV ad, every web ad, ever web page, every email, the national conventions, signage -- it’s almost an unlimited number of uses.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »