Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Three Elections' Worth of Bain Attacks on Romney Three Elections' Worth of Bain Attacks on Romney

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation



Three Elections' Worth of Bain Attacks on Romney


Anti-Romney Bain Ad by Obama campaign(YouTube)

Every time Mitt Romney has run for office, his Democratic opponent has made a big deal about his career at Bain Capital. But in the last 25 years, the Democratic attack has changed, and so has Romney's response to it. Will President Obama's Bain ads, released this week, be effective like in 1994? Or a failure like in 2002? It helps to look at how both sides have adapted to the Man of the People arms race.

Race: 1994 Senate campaign in Massachusetts against incumbent Sen. Ted Kennedy.


Democrat's Charge: Romney looked like a serious threat to Kennedy by the early fall, and in September the senator began airing a series of six ads about Bain Capital, focusing specifically on Ampad, a paper company Bain bought in 1992 and used to acquire a paper factory in Marion, Ind., according to newspaper accounts at the time. The ad claimed Bain forced the factory to lay off 350 workers and told them they could reapply for their old jobs with at 25 percent wage cut. (Ampad later went bankrupt.) "He has cut our wages to put money in his pocket," a worker complained in one ad. At a parade in which Romney marched, Indiana workers were handing out leaflets. "Seeing the strikers up close like this, in person, makes you really think about their situation," a woman in the parade crowd said, according to an Oct. 10, 1994 Boston Globe story. "I was kind of attracted to Romney. But this really make me rethink things. I'm undecided now."

Romney's Response: As New York's Benjamin Wallace-Wells notes, Romney was forced to say, "I'm happy to meet with the workers and hear their concerns and see if there's anything I can do.... But I'm in no position to negotiate with the union negotiators or the company negotiators." He started cutting ads depicting himself as a man of the people. He told a crowd that Kennedy was like how "a pickpocket creates a diversion" -- an oddly Uncle-Moneybags response. He conceded that Kennedy was a nice guy: "I don't think he's a bad person ... I just think he's out of touch," Romney told a crowd, as The Globe reported on Oct. 14, 1994.

What Was Unique: It wasn't ancient history. Workers were getting laid off during the campaign. Bloomberg's Paul M. Barrett reported earlier this year how after the Independence Day holiday, workers returned to find this note: "As of 3 p.m. today, July 5, 1994, your employment with SCM Office Supplies Inc. will end." Wallace-Wells explains that one of the Indiana workers, Harold Kellogg, road-tripped with five of his coworkers to Boston. They traveled around telling their story. When Kennedy's ads first aired, The Boston Globe speculated that "voters may see this series as the powerful Kennedy machine beating up on that nice young man." That was not the case. By Oct. 7, 1994, The Globe's headline was: "Poll Suggests Kennedy is Halting Romney Gains." The paper's pollster, Gerry Chervinsky, explained, "A doubt has been raised in people's minds about whether Romney really is on the side of the working person."


Outcome: In the year of the Republican Revolution, in which the party captured a majority in both chambers of Congress for the first time in 40 years, Romney lost by 17 percentage points.

comments powered by Disqus