CAMPAIGN 2012

Santorum Says He's the Most Consistent Social Conservative

Candidate addresses crowd of more than 4,000 in Oklahoma.

Updated: February 9, 2012 | 7:57 p.m.
February 9, 2012 | 5:39 p.m.

Republican presidential candidate, former Pennsylvania Sen. Rick Santorum, speaks at a campaign rally in Coral Springs, Fla. Sunday, Jan. 22, 2012. (AP Photo/Steve Mitchell) (AP Photo/Steve Mitchell)

TULSA, Okla. -- Rick Santorum said on Thursday that his presidential rivals haven’t been as consistent as he has been on gay rights and abortion. He also blasted President Obama on what he called the president's insufficient support for Israel.

Addressing an audience of more than 4,000 people at Oral Roberts University, Santorum fielded a student’s question about the potential attacks he would receive on abortion and gay rights from Obama if he were to win the Republican nomination.

“The other candidates in this race have the same positions I have on these issues,” Santorum said. “At least, that is what they say right now.”

He told the audience they should vote for him in the primary if they want a candidate who understands the issues and articulates them consistently. “If you are someone who is a voter who may not agree with me on those issues, or agree with any of us on those issues, who are you going to feel more comfortable with?” he asked.

A poll this week showed Santorum running a distant third behind Newt Gingrich and Mitt Romney in Oklahoma, but the former senator from Pennsylvania is counting on momentum from his wins on Tuesday in Colorado, Minnesota, and Missouri.

During his speech, Santorum also ripped Obama in unusually harsh terms for the decision to oppose the Keystone XL pipeline, telling the audience that it amounted to backing oil-rich Iran over Israel.

"We're throwing Israel under the bus because we know we're going to be dependent upon OPEC," he said. "We're going to say, 'Iran, we don't want you to get a nuclear weapon,' -- wink wink nod nod -- 'go ahead, just give us your oil.'"

In a subsequent interview on CNN after the speech, host John King asked the candidate if he really believed Obama was attempting to undermine Israel's security, and Santorum stood by his remarks.

"This is a president who is not standing by our allies. It's trying to appease, trying to find a way clearly to allow Iran to get this nuclear weapon," he said. "He's doing absolutely nothing in a consequential way to make sure they don't get this weapon."

Santorum also took a swing at his former Senate colleague Barbara Boxer, saying he sharply disagreed with the liberal California Democrat on reproductive and contraception issues.

"Barbara Boxer is sort of a dog whistle for me when it came to the United States Senate," he said. "Every time she went on the floor of the Senate, I just felt this magnet to run. She said women's rights trump religious rights. Maybe she ought to read the First Amendment again."

Santorum said in the CNN interview that he hoped to be able to release his tax returns within a couple of days. He had promised to do so shortly after Romney released his returns.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Most Read Articles
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama’s Second-Term G-8 Dance Card: Judo With Putin, Trade, and Syria

June 18, 2013
The president returns to Berlin five years later less the rock star and more the battle-hardened pragmatist.
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

June 18, 2013
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
More Columns »