CAMPAIGN 2012

Santorum: Romney and Paul Have Backroom Deal

Updated: February 25, 2012 | 4:36 p.m.
February 25, 2012 | 12:14 p.m.

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum says rivals Ron Paul, left, and Mitt Romney, right, are coordinating their attacks on him. (Jae C. Hong/AP)

ST. CLAIR SHORES, Mich. — Rick Santorum on Saturday suggested two of his rivals for the GOP presidential nomination are trying to strike a backroom, running-mate deal.

Asked at a tea party rally here why former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney and Rep. Ron Paul of Texas seemed to be ganging up on Santorum during Wednesday’s debate in Arizona, the former senator from Pennsylvania quipped, “Yeah, look, I didn’t know we picked president and vice president before the election.

“The coordination that I felt at that debate was pretty clear,” he said. “I felt like messages were being slipped behind my chair. It’s pretty remarkable that in 20 debates, Ron Paul never attacked Mitt Romney.”

It’s not the first time Santorum has made the charge. Right after the CNN-sponsored debate on Wednesday, he told reporters, “You have to ask Congressman Paul and Governor Romney what they’ve got going together. Their commercials look a lot alike and so do their attacks.”

Paul on Friday flatly denied there is any coordination between the two campaigns. In an appearance on CNBC, Paul said, “Absolutely not.” And then, quoting former Minnesota Gov. Tim Pawlenty, Paul said, “I thought Pawlenty cleared it up pretty well. He said, ‘If you think Ron Paul’s going to do a backroom deal, you’ve got another thought coming,’ something along those lines.”

Also on Saturday, Santorum did some attacking of his own, calling Romney “uniquely unqualified to take on government control” during a speech at an Americans for Prosperity conference in Troy, Mich. Earlier, in St. Clair Shores, he called Romney’s criticisms that Santorum isn’t conservative “laughable,” and mocked Romney’s campaign record.

“He’s had to be what he wants to be,” Santorum said. “‘Oh, I’m running for the Senate against Ted Kennedy, I’ll be a liberal. I’m running for governor of Massachusetts, so I’ll be a moderate.’ … And now, ‘Oh, I’m gonna run for the Republican nomination for president, I’ll be a conservative today.’ What’s he gonna be tomorrow?”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »