CAMPAIGN 2012

Santorum Raises Polygamy in Defending Stand Against Gay Marriage

'What about three men?' the candidate asks in New Hampshire.

Updated: January 5, 2012 | 8:48 p.m.
January 5, 2012 | 6:00 p.m.

CONCORD, N.H. –- In a spirited debate with gay-rights supporters, GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum on Thursday defended his opposition to liberalizing marriage laws by raising the specter of polygamy. “What about three men?” he asked.

The comment evoked memories of the ex-Pennsylvania senator's controversial statement to the Associated Press in 2003 in which he associated gay sex with incest and bestiality.

Santorum encouraged the debate with several audience members who attended his address at a college convention sponsored by New England College. The audience of about 200 people included several supporters of Santorum’s rival, libertarian Rep. Ron Paul of Texas. Some booed Santorum when he left the stage.

One audience member, a college-aged man, asked Santorum how gay marriage affected him personally. A young woman asked him to justify his embrace of constitutional freedoms such as life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness while at the same time denying the right for gay couples to marry. They were the sort of in-your-face questions that New Hampshire town hall meetings are known for.

“Who’s attempting to change the law?” Santorum replied. He sharply challenged the man to defend his support of gay marriage. Several audience members shouted answers in support of the questioner.

“Oh, no,” Santorum said. “We’re not going to shout.” He admonished the crowd to raise their hands before speaking. Heeding his request, a gay-marriage supporter suggested that Santorum is a hypocrite for restricting the right to marry while espousing constitutional rights to liberty, freedom, and happiness.

“Are we saying that everybody should have the right to marry?” Santorum said, issuing a challenge to his audience.

“Yes!” several shouted.

Santorum: “So anyone can marry anyone else?”

“Yes!”

Santorum: “So anybody can marry multiple people?”

Crowd members grumbled and shouted over each other. Santorum called for order again. “OK, maybe we can’t do this,” he said. “We’re going to have a civil discussion or move on to another question.”

The crowd quieted and one woman spoke for the pro-gay-marriage faction by saying that married couples don’t harm anybody.

Replied Santorum: “What about three men?” He was being provocative and might not have expected the answer he got.

“Go for it,” she said. Once he realized that she was condoning polygamy among same-sex couples, Santorum sarcastically framed the pro-gay-marriage argument thusly: Anybody, he said, can marry as many people as they want. The gay-rights supporters stood and applauded Santorum, apparently mocking him.

He moved on gracefully and without objection from the crowd after restating his view that God created men and women with the specific purpose to reproduce and marry. “I believe God made man that way,” he said.

Much later in the event, after taking several questions unrelated to gay marriage, Santorum fielded one more on the topic.  He briefly answered it and, thanking the audience for inviting him, ended the 70-minute appearance.

As he walked from the lectern to sign a convention banner, several crowed members booed – marring what was otherwise a mostly civil debate between the candidate and the crowd.

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »