CAMPAIGN 2012

Ryan Takes Softer Tone Than Romney on Middle East Attacks

The vice presidential candidate calls for a moment of silence.

Updated: September 12, 2012 | 3:31 p.m.
September 12, 2012 | 3:03 p.m.

DE PERE, Wis. – Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan took a softer tone than Republican nominee Mitt Romney in response to protests and attacks on American diplomats in Libya and Egypt. He began a campaign event here Wednesday with a moment of silence rather than outright criticism for the Obama administration’s response to violence in the region.

“This is a time for healing. It is a time for resolve. And in the face of such a tragedy, we are reminded that the world needs American leadership. And the best guarantee of peace is American strength,” Ryan said.

Romney has said that a statement from the U.S. Embassy in Cairo, which condemned “those who abuse the universal right of free speech to hurt the religious beliefs of others,” amounted to an administration apology for U.S. principles. While Ryan did not directly rebuke the president, he framed a Romney-Ryan foreign policy as being better able to articulate American values abroad than President Obama has been during his term.

“It is very important that a president speak with a singular voice representing our principles and our values. We don't want people around the world wondering what our values are. We believe in individual rights, and particularly in the Middle East, we believe in women's rights,” Ryan said during a town-hall meeting with about 1,500 voters in his home state.

“If you show weakness, if you show moral equivocation, then foreign-policy adventurism among our adversaries will increase. We do not want a world climate where our adversaries are so tempted to test us and our allies are worried about trusting us, and that is unfortunately the path that we are on right now.”

When a woman in the audience mentioned Shakil Afridi, a Pakistani doctor who has been jailed for helping the CIA collect information about the family of al-Qaida leader Osama bin Laden before a raid last year, Ryan accused the administration of leaking security details about the operation.

“These leaks on national security coming from the White House undermine the men and women who put risks on their lives for us. This is not helpful,” he said, to extended applause from the audience. “I suppose it could have served some short-term political gain…. But let's ask this question: If you're a doctor in Pakistan and the American government asks you to help in the future and you see that, what do you think you're going to do?”

“These leaks are not helpful. They're counterproductive,” Ryan said, promising that a Romney-Ryan administration would not make the same “mistakes.”

 

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »