CAMPAIGN 2012

Ryan Grilled on Abortion and 'Forcible Rape'

The vice presidential candidate sidesteps when asked to define 'forcible rape' and says Romney's views will prevail.

Updated: August 24, 2012 | 12:14 p.m.
August 22, 2012 | 9:32 a.m.

ROANOKE, Va. – Vice presidential candidate Paul Ryan, in his first solo public statement about controversial comments made by Missouri Senate hopeful Todd Akin, called Akin’s comments “outrageous” in an interview with KDKA Pittsburgh. The staunchly antiabortion Ryan declined to explain the phrase "forcible rape," which appeared in a bill he co-sponsored with Akin.

Ryan, in the interview taped on Tuesday in the Pittsburgh suburbs, said of Akin's suggestion that women can biologically repel pregnancies in cases involving “legitimate” rape,“His statements were outrageous, over the pale. I don’t know anybody who would agree with that. Rape is rape. Period. End of story.”

Ryan acknowledged that as vice president, his views on abortion would not have the weight of Romney's. For more than a decade, Ryan has opposed all abortions except to save the life of the woman; Romney supports exceptions for rape and incest.

“Well, look, I’m proud of my pro-life record. And I stand by my pro-life record in Congress. It’s something I’m proud of,” Ryan said. “But Mitt Romney is the top of the ticket, and Mitt Romney will be president, and he will set the policy of the Romney administration.”

Ryan was asked in the interview about his co-sponsorhip, with Akin, of a bill barring federal funding for abortions with an exception carved out for “forcible rape.” He sidestepped a direct question about what he meant by “forcible rape,” a much-criticized term by abortion rights advocates.

“Rape is rape. There is no splitting hairs over rape,” Ryan replied.

Obama spokeswoman Lis Smith issued a statement blasting Ryan for his earlier involvement with the bill, saying “As a Republican leader in the House, Paul Ryan worked with Todd Akin to try to narrow the definition of rape and outlaw abortion even for rape victims. He may hope that American women never learn about this record, but they deserve an answer to why he wanted to redefine rape and remove protections for rape victims.”

Asked later by reporters on his plane if he regretted sponsoring abortion legislation with Akin, Ryan replied, “That bill passed I think by 251 votes. It was bipartisan. I think HR-3 is the one you are talking about. I think we had 251 votes, 16 Democrats. I am proud of my pro-life record I have.” The House roll call shows Ryan was remembering correctly.

Ryan said he had spoken to Akin on Tuesday night and it went as “you would imagine.” He declined to give further details. “I will keep it between us, but I agree with (Sen.) Roy (Blunt) and (former Sen.) Jack Danforth and the rest of the people from the Missouri delegation, current and former, that he should have dropped out of the race. But he is not, he is going to run his campaign and we are going to run ours.” He said he had no plans to talk to Akin again to try to convince him to withdraw.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »