CAMPAIGN 2012

Ron Paul Woos Social Conservatives

Deficit hawk says his libertarian values are rooted in the Bible.

Updated: October 8, 2011 | 12:22 p.m.
October 8, 2011 | 12:20 p.m.

Republican Presidential candidate Ron Paul speaks to a group of supporters at the Family Research Council's Values Voters Summit on Saturday. (Chet Susslin)

Ron Paul, the outspoken libertarian who doesn’t always toe the socially conservative line, on Saturday tried to sell his philosophy to an audience of religious activists – and seemed to be succeeding, at least on the applause meter.

Kicking off day two of the Values Voters Summit in Washington, D.C., the longtime Texas congressman and three-time presidential candidate drew boisterous ovations with his standard critique of military intervention.
 
This time, Paul gave it a twist geared toward the family values-centric audience: “One of the greatest threats to the family is war; it undermines the family,” he said, before going on to give his usual arguments about the damage wars do to the nation’s economy and  diplomatic relations. 

Paul’s relations with religious conservatives are prickly because of his dogmatic opposition to government intervention: He opposes gay marriage, for instance, but doesn’t think the federal government should have a role in defining marriage. And he opposes federal government regulation of drugs and prostitution. “You have the right to do things that are very controversial,” he said at a debate in South Carolina in May.

To bolster his anti-abortion credentials, Paul referred to having delivered  “thousands of babies” in his practice as an obstetrician. “You cannot defend liberty if you don’t understand life and where it comes from,” Paul said in one of several lines that brought the audience to its feet.
 
The biggest applause of the morning came when Paul noted that debt “is not a Biblical principle,” and asked, “Why is it that we don’t fight for the right to keep the fruits of our labor?”
 
Despite his reputation for pulling off unexpected straw poll victories, Paul placed second-to-last in the mock election at last year’s Values Voters Summit. For this year’s vote, to be announced Saturday afternoon, he may have come better prepared: During his speech, a sizeable group of Paul supporters cheered and chanted his name.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »