2012 ELECTION

Ron Paul: No Coordination With Romney

Paul laughs off Santorum's claim that he and Romney are working together

Updated: February 26, 2012 | 7:58 a.m.
February 26, 2012 | 6:15 a.m.

Republican presidential candidates Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, left, and former Massachusetts Gov. Mitt Romney. (Jae C. Hong/AP)

MT. PLEASANT, MICHIGAN -- Ron Paul on Saturday laughed off remarks made by his fellow GOP presidential candidate Rick Santorum earlier in the day speculating that Paul and Mitt Romney have a backroom running mate deal going.

“I don’t know what all that meant,” Paul chuckled backstage of a rally he held here at Central Michigan University. “No, we’ve never had a conversation, anything like that… but he’s a family person, I’ve known him for five years, so it is a little bit different. But I don’t agree with [him on] hardly anything probably.”

Santorum has openly speculated that Paul and Romney are working together. He vented his frustration at multiple events on Saturday that “in 20 debates, Ron Paul never attacked Mitt Romney.” During last week’s debate in Arizona, Santorum said, “I felt like messages were being slipped behind my chair.”

Paul admitted to reporters that he’s never “volunteered” an attack on Romney during a debate, but said he “answered the questions when they asked me.” He said Santorum’s sudden gripe about the issue shows that he’s “desperate.”

As for the Texas congressman’s attack ad’s, which have been harsh on Santorum but absent on Romney, particularly in Michigan, Paul said that “right now the anti-Romney candidate is Santorum, so I have to get his votes as I did at one time with Gingrich.”

Though Saturday marked Paul’s first day campaigning in Michigan, more than 2,000 students and other supporters greeted him with signs and chants at what was billed as a “Soldier, Airmen, and Sailors for Ron Paul” rally. Paul has been polling third in the state, behind Santorum and Romney.

Asked about his expectations, Paul said his campaign isn’t shooting for a specific percentage threshold, but bragged that he holds the second-highest number of “firm delegates” so far of any of the candidates.

“I feel good, but I’m realistic,” he said. “And this is our first trip up where, so we expect to do well but I don’t have any precise predictions. But we have a lot of enthusiasm, a lot of supporters, and I’m encouraged when I come to a meeting like we had here tonight.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Most Read Articles
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »