SUNDAY SHOWS

Ron Paul 'A Little Bit Disappointed' After Maine

Updated: February 13, 2012 | 6:49 a.m.
February 12, 2012 | 11:36 a.m.

Republican presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, speaks to supporters during his caucus night party Tuesday, Feb. 7, 2012, in Golden Valley, Minn. (JIM MONE/AP)

Presidential candidate Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, on Sunday waved off the suggestion that his narrow loss to Mitt Romney in Maine Saturday night was especially disappointing given his dogged efforts in the state. Paul attributed the loss to one of the counties canceling its caucus.

“You know, we were a little bit disappointed last night,” Paul said on CBS’ Face the Nation. “We did very well up there. But we're going to continue to do what we do and do the very best and keep accumulating delegates.”

Paul skipped last week’s Conservative Political Action Conference in D.C. – a show he frequently steals with adoring fans and straw poll victories – to campaign in Maine, though there were no delegates awarded in the Maine caucuses.

Asked if he really thought he could get the nomination or if he was simply competing to be a force at the convention, Paul was vague. “Sure, I think both,” he said. “We're there to win, do our best. Romney has been up and down. The others have been up and down. I haven't been down. I keep going up. I don't really go up and down.”

And, in the latest indication of what many suspect to be a non-aggression pact between Paul and Romney, Paul turned a question about Romney’s struggle to convince voters of his conservative credibility into a criticism of Romney’s rivals.

“Well, I don't know exactly why [Romney is singled out], because I think if it comes to [Newt Gingrich or Rick Santorum], they should suffer the same consequences,” Paul said. “Maybe it's the type of coverage and the image. But I don't think they have been vetted very well because I know them pretty well. Their records are far from being conservative.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


More By This Writer
Katy O'Donnell's Pic
Katy O'Donnell | Staff Writer, Budget, Taxes, and Trade
kodonnell@nationaljournal.com
Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »