CAMPAIGN 2012

Romney Uses 2007 Biden Comment to Attack Administration on Coal

Democrats counter with 2003 Romney statement criticizing a Massachusetts plant.

Updated: August 14, 2012 | 2:22 p.m.
August 14, 2012 | 2:14 p.m.

BEALLSVILLE, Ohio – Campaigning in rural coal country, Mitt Romney on Tuesday revived a controversial five-year-old comment from Vice President Joe Biden as evidence that the Obama administration is insufficiently committed to energy from coal.

In a 2007 interview on HBO’s Real Time With Bill Maher, Biden, then a 2008 presidential candidate, was asked which is more likely to contribute to Americans’ deaths — air pollution from coal, high-fructose corn syrup, or a terrorist attack. Biden responded: “Air that has too much coal in it, corn syrup next, then a terrorist attack. But that is not in any way to diminish the fact that a terrorist attack is real. It is not an existential threat to bringing down the country, but it does have the capacity, still, to kill thousands of people. But hundreds of thousands of people die and their lives are shortened because of coal plants, coal-fired plants, and because of corn syrup.”

Addressing a crowd in Beallsville, Romney attacked President Obama’s energy policies and added, “His vice president said coal is more dangerous than terrorists. Can you imagine that? This tells you precisely what he actually feels and what he’s done and his policies over the last three and a half years have put in place the very vision he had when he was running for office.”

The video of Biden’s comment has made the rounds of conservative blogs and websites for years. Republicans have repeatedly accused Obama of waging a “war on coal,” pointing to declines in its usage, while administration officials say economics are to blame: The Environmental Protection Agency has been devising court-mandated rules on air pollution at a time when low natural-gas prices are pushing out coal-generated electricity.

Romney also took issue with a claim that the Obama administration is committed to coal and sought to eliminate any suspicion — fueled by Democrats' highlighting of a 2003 statement opposing a Massachusetts coal plant in which he declared that he would not “create jobs that kill people” — that he is against coal.

“Of course I like all the sources of energy,” he said. “You’ve probably heard the president say he’s for all of the above, and I wondered what he meant because I see how he’s waging war on coal. And I wonder how he could possibly say that. Then it came to me: He’s for all the sources of energy that come from above the ground.”

Under questioning from reporters, Romney senior adviser Kevin Madden said that Romney hasn’t changed his position on coal over the years. He said that Romney’s opposition to the Massachusetts plant stemmed from concerns over its safety.

“Any time you’re dealing with any sort of energy exploration, safety is important – no change in that,” Madden said.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »