CAMPAIGN 2012

Romney Talks About Troops, Afghanistan at National Guard Conference

The GOP nominee focuses on topics he bypassed in his convention speech.

Updated: September 11, 2012 | 5:29 p.m.
September 11, 2012 | 5:23 p.m.

Mitt Romney leaves the stage after speaking to members of the National Guard Association Convention in Reno, Nev., Tuesday, Sept. 11, 2012. (AP Photo/Scott Sady)

RENO, Nev. –Mitt Romney paid tribute to the work of U.S. troops and veterans Tuesday in a speech that honored those affected by the 9/11 terrorist attacks and focused on topics he was criticized for bypassing in his acceptance speech at the Republican convention.

The GOP nominee declined to directly attack President Obama, telling more than 4,000 people at a National Guard Association Conference that would be inappropriate on the 11th anniversary of the worst terrorist attack on American soil. 

“With less than two months to go before Election Day, I would normally speak to a gathering like this about the differences between my and my opponent’s plans for our military and for our national security,” Romney said. “There is a time and a place for that, but this day is not it.” 

Romney drew reproaches from Democrats and Republicans alike after he failed to mention either the troops or the ongoing war in Afghanistan during his convention speech.  After a week of fielding questions about that decision, he specifically nodded Tuesday to the 70,000 men and women still on the ground in Afghanistan and weighed in on their fate.

“Our goal should be to complete a successful transition to Afghan security forces by the end of 2014,” he said.  “We should evaluate conditions on the ground and solicit the best advice of our military commanders.” 

But, in an implied critique of Obama, Romney argued that the return of the troops should not be used as “an excuse to hollow out our military through devastating defense budget cuts.”  He has been aggressively attacking Obama this week for his role in a bipartisan debt deal that required automatic defense cuts if Congress and the White House could not agree on other ways to reduce the national debt. Romney running mate Paul Ryan was among those who voted for the deal.

In a statement emailed to reporters, Obama campaign spokesperson Lis Smith wrote that when it comes to the automatic defense cuts, Obama and Romney are in agreement. 

“The president agrees that we should avoid the automatic defense cuts in the Budget Control Act,” Smith wrote.  “That’s why he has called on congressional Republicans to help prevent them by asking millionaires and billionaires to pay their fair share.”

While Romney avoided mentioning Obama by name in his speech, he implied that the country and the military need a new commander in chief. “We can all agree that our men and women in the field deserve a clear mission,” Romney said, “that they deserve the resources and resolute leadership they need to complete that mission, and that they deserve a country that will provide for their needs when they come home.” 

Romney pointed to veterans’ health care as one area he would focus on as president, saying he’d work to eliminate a backlog of disability claims, try to shorten waits for mental health treatment, and treat the suicide rate among active-duty soldiers “like the emergency it is.”

“Veterans’ benefits are not a gift that is given, but a debt that is due,” he said to applause.

Romney also marked the 11th anniversary of  September 11th by remembering the victims who died in New York, Virginia and Pennsylvania and cited the troops sent around the world as a result of the attacks. “We will not forget why they are fighting or who they are fighting for,” Romney said. “They are faithful to us and to our country; we must not break faith with them.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »