CAMPAIGN 2012

Romney Slams Obama's 'Misleading' Ads Amid Criticism of His Own Attacks

The GOP candidate says Obama and his allies should take down their false TV spots.

Updated: August 9, 2012 | 11:58 a.m.
August 9, 2012 | 10:36 a.m.

NEW YORK — Mitt Romney on Thursday took umbrage at what he called inaccurate and misleading ads run by the Obama campaign and an allied super PAC, even as his own campaign continues to run an attack ad that has deemed “pants on fire” false by a fact-check organization.

Asked by conservative radio host Bill Bennett about the “lowball nature” of an ad being run by the pro-Obama Priorities USA Action super PAC, which tries to tie the presumptive nominee to a woman’s cancer death, Romney said fact-checking groups have called the ad misleading.

“The various fact-checkers look at some of these charges that are in the Obama ads, and they say that they’re wrong and inaccurate, and yet he keeps on just running them,” Romney said in the radio interview. “You know, in the past, when people pointed out that something was inaccurate, why, campaigns either pulled the ad [or] they were embarrassed. Today they just blast ahead.”

But the issue cuts both ways, as Romney well knows. His own campaign’s most recent ad claims that under the Obama administration’s recent changes to welfare reform, people wouldn’t have to work or train for a job. “They just send you your welfare check,” a voiceover proclaims. This claim has also been debunked by multiple fact-check groups, which point out that the changes to the welfare law are meant to offer states greater flexibility, but require that states increase the amount of people moving from welfare to work.

Despite his own rhetoric decrying false and misleading advertisements, Romney’s campaign has shown no sign that it will remove its own factually challenged ads or stop making similar charges on the stump.  Instead, Romney continues to make the argument that Obama is pushing a “policy of removing work from welfare,” which he says will move the country toward “a culture of dependency.” 

To bolster his point, Romney gave an example of a question he was asked while shaking hands on the rope line after a campaign event in Iowa on Wednesday.

“[A woman] said, ‘But you know, how about the people who have children at home and, you know, don’t want to work?’ And it’s like, well, we have to work,” Romney told Bennett in his radio interview. “The idea we’re going to have a citizenry that raises families but doesn’t work, and the concept of government to pay for the nurturing of their children and for the support of the adult, that is just not something that can build the kind of society which is uplifting to the individual and strengthening to the nation.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »