CAMPAIGN 2012

Romney Leaves Arizona Mocking Santorum

Using an argument he himself has often had to defend, Romney paints Santorum as unprincipled.

Updated: February 23, 2012 | 12:56 p.m.
February 23, 2012 | 12:55 p.m.

PHOENIX – Mitt Romney, who got in some clean shots at chief rival Rick Santorum during the CNN debate in Mesa, took a few more on Thursday to reinforce his new line of attack on Santorum as a politician without a core.

Santorum had a rough night in which he was forced to defend congressional votes he cast “for the team” even though he opposed the bills, at least in part. "I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a politician explain in so many ways why it was he voted against his principles," Romney told the Associated Builders and Contractors.

"He explained why he voted to protect Davis-Bacon. He explained why he voted to raise the debt ceiling five times without compensating cuts in federal spending. He explained why it was he voted to fund Planned Parenthood even though that was against his principles. He explained why he voted for No Child Left Behind even though that was against his principles. He explained why he voted for the bridge to nowhere even though that was against his principles."

Romney, who has had his own problems presenting himself as consistent given his shifts on some issues, added:  "I can tell you one thing. If I’m president of the United States, I will abide by my principles and my team will be the people of the United States of America."

In the Wednesday night debate, Santorum said that he had voted for the No Child Left Behind education bill because politics is a "team sport" and it seemed necessary at the time. "I have to admit, I voted for that. It was against the principles I believed in, but you know, when you're part of the team, sometimes you take one for the team, for the leader, and I made a mistake," Santorum said, to audible audience disapproval.

Romney told the contractors that Santorum spent most of the debate explaining “why he did or voted for things he disagreed with. And he talked about this as being taking one for the team. I wonder which team he was taking it for. My team is the American people, not the insiders in Washington."

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

GOP’s Switch on Financial Disclosure Wins Gold Medal in Hypocrisy Olympics

9:30 p.m.
The IRS scandal evolved from the broader reality that the GOP has changed its financing mantra from “disclosure” to “secrecy.”
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
More Columns »