CAMPAIGN 2012

Romney Leaves Arizona Mocking Santorum

Using an argument he himself has often had to defend, Romney paints Santorum as unprincipled.

Updated: February 23, 2012 | 12:56 p.m.
February 23, 2012 | 12:55 p.m.

PHOENIX – Mitt Romney, who got in some clean shots at chief rival Rick Santorum during the CNN debate in Mesa, took a few more on Thursday to reinforce his new line of attack on Santorum as a politician without a core.

Santorum had a rough night in which he was forced to defend congressional votes he cast “for the team” even though he opposed the bills, at least in part. "I don’t know if I’ve ever seen a politician explain in so many ways why it was he voted against his principles," Romney told the Associated Builders and Contractors.

"He explained why he voted to protect Davis-Bacon. He explained why he voted to raise the debt ceiling five times without compensating cuts in federal spending. He explained why it was he voted to fund Planned Parenthood even though that was against his principles. He explained why he voted for No Child Left Behind even though that was against his principles. He explained why he voted for the bridge to nowhere even though that was against his principles."

Romney, who has had his own problems presenting himself as consistent given his shifts on some issues, added:  "I can tell you one thing. If I’m president of the United States, I will abide by my principles and my team will be the people of the United States of America."

In the Wednesday night debate, Santorum said that he had voted for the No Child Left Behind education bill because politics is a "team sport" and it seemed necessary at the time. "I have to admit, I voted for that. It was against the principles I believed in, but you know, when you're part of the team, sometimes you take one for the team, for the leader, and I made a mistake," Santorum said, to audible audience disapproval.

Romney told the contractors that Santorum spent most of the debate explaining “why he did or voted for things he disagreed with. And he talked about this as being taking one for the team. I wonder which team he was taking it for. My team is the American people, not the insiders in Washington."

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »