Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

Romney: Health Care Ruling Creates 'Choice' Between Two Agendas Romney: Health Care Ruling Creates 'Choice' Between Two Agendas

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Want access to this content? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


Campaign 2012

Romney: Health Care Ruling Creates 'Choice' Between Two Agendas

Romney Responds to Supreme Court Health Care Ruling--VIDEO

The Supreme Court may have upheld President Obama's health care law, but Mitt Romney reaffirmed his desire to overturn the statute, saying the decision forces voters to choose between current policy and what he called a far less government-intrusive approach.


"This is the time of choice for the American people," the Republican presidential candidate said. "Our mission is clear: If we want to get rid of 'Obamacare,' we're going to have to replace President Obama. My mission is to make sure we do exactly that."

Although the Court said that the law does not violate the Constitution, Romney said, the justices did not take a position on whether it "is good law or that it's good policy. Obamacare was bad policy yesterday; it's bad policy today. Obamacare was bad law yesterday; it's bad law today."

He concluded his remarks by saying: "If you don't want the course that President Obama has put us on, if you want instead a course that the Founders envisioned, then join me in this effort. Help us. Help us defeat Obamacare. Help us defeat the liberal agenda that makes government too big, too intrusive, and is killing jobs across this great country."


Romney has waited for the Court's decision in his room at the Washington Hilton with a group that included Georgia Attorney General Sam Olens, whose state was among those that had sued over the law.

The presumptive GOP presidential nominee has sought to make the economy the overriding focus of his campaign, even as issues such as the Court's recent ruling on immigration have diverted him from that approach. But Romney had been previewing the health care ruling over the course of the week, suggesting that if the law were overturned, he would argue that the president had wasted the last three and a half years of his presidency and that Obama's attention to health care reform was a “moral failure” amid an economic crisis.

“It was not just bad policy; it was a moral failure to put forward a piece of legislation that wouldn’t help Americans get back to work, and to focus the energy of the White House on Obamacare,” he said in Sterling, Va., on Wednesday evening.

Going forward, Romney will continue to argue that the law is bad policy and overly burdensome on job creators, even if it is constitutionally sound.


While the Court’s decision represents a major disappointment for conservatives, it will help ensure a fresh wave of excitement among the base to defeat Obama. Proof of that came in the more than $1 million that Romney's campaign said was raised within four hours of the ruling's announcement.

The worst outcome for Romney’s election strategy would have been if the law had been overturned, because he would have lost a chief rationale for his campaign.

It posed a significant challenge to the presumptive nominee during the GOP primary campaign -- and still could do so -- because of a 2006 law he signed as Massachusetts governor that bore remarkable resemblance to the federal law in its use of mandates to ensure maximum coverage.

Although Romney has repeatedly argued that his plan was only appropriate for Massachusetts, not the nation, the Obama administration cited the state health care law he championed as a model for the federal law.

Romney's reasoning wasn’t enough for many of his primary opponents. Former Sen. Rick Santorum of Pennsylvania was particularly scathing during the campaign, painting his rival as “uniquely disqualified” to do away with the law.

Santorum appeared on the steps of the Supreme Court while lawyers were arguing the case before the justices and said, “There's one candidate who is uniquely disqualified to make the case. It's the reason I'm here and he's not. The reason that I talk about Obamacare and its impact on the economy and on fundamental freedoms and Mitt Romney doesn't. It's because he can't because he supported government-run health care as governor of Massachusetts.”

For now, Romney will continue to run on a pledge to repeal and replace the health care law as president. He has said that he will issue states a waiver from the law. He has also said he would like to block grant Medicaid money to the states and put in place reforms to make the health care industry “more like a market” by giving consumers more options. Romney has further said he would like to give seniors the option of purchasing “private-sector Medicare.”

comments powered by Disqus