SUNDAY SHOWS

Romney Economic Adviser Says Reforms Must Target the Wealthy

Updated: June 3, 2012 | 11:13 a.m.
June 3, 2012 | 10:46 a.m.

Glenn Hubbard, an economic adviser to Mitt Romney, clarified some of the details of Romney’s plan to improve the economy on Sunday, insisting that all options were on the table when it comes tax reform, but also asserting that such reform would have to focus on wealthier Americans.

Speaking on CNN’s Fareed Zakaria GPS, Hubbard said that Romney wants to get marginal tax rates to the same levels as proposed in the Bowles-Simpson deficit reduction plan, but to pay for such cuts, Romney has proposed broadening the tax base.

“The bulk of the adjustment [must] be borne by upper income households,” Hubbard said of Romney’s tax reform plan. “Everything has to be on the table, and again, the adjustment really has to focus on upper income households.”

On welfare reform, Hubbard said that Romney’s plan would also focus on the rich, as his proposed reforms would “limit Medicare support, particularly for more affluent seniors,” and Romney would “slow the rate of growth of [Social Security] benefits for upper-income people.”

This assertion may placate some critics concerned that Romney is inclined to favor the rich in his policy proposals. But Hubbard’s explanation of Romney’s long-term outlook on the deficit may irritate more fiscally conservative Republicans, particularly the tea party, which is notoriously averse to any national deficit whatsoever. Hubbard indicated that it’s “the very big deficits that the country should be afraid of,” whereas small deficits are alright.

“If we can get federal spending to 20 percent of GDP by 2016, the deficit will be very small. A healthy tax system and a healthy economy would produce 18 percent, 19 percent of GDP in revenue. So those won't be large deficits,” he said.

With a fierce debate over expiring tax cuts and pending budget sequesters looming, Hubbard said that the best option for Congress might be to kick the can down the road if Romney is elected. “If we get to a situation where Governor Romney becomes the president, then the lame-duck congress ought to simply shift things down the road a few months to the enactment of Governor Romney's tax plan,” he said.

“If the president wins re-election, that's a different negotiation," he said.

See all NJ’s Sunday show coverage | Get Sunday show coverage in your inbox

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »