CAMPAIGN 2012

Romney Blasts 'Tepid' Recovery in Victory Speech

Updated: March 20, 2012 | 10:14 p.m.
March 20, 2012 | 9:39 p.m.

After winning big in President Obama’s home state of Illinois, Mitt Romney enjoyed a rare decisive moment in his long struggle for the GOP nomination, stepping out in front of a large suburban crowd and declaring, “What a night! Thank you, Illinois.”

The former Massachusetts governor focused entirely on President Obama and the shape of economy in his post-primary speech to a boisterous crowd in Schaumburg, a suburb northwest of Chicago.

“We've had enough,” Romney said. “We know our future. We know our future is brighter than these troubled times. We still believe in America. And we deserve a president who believes in us. And I believe in the American people.”

Although acknowledging the economy is rebounding, he blamed the president’s policies for precluding a bigger bounce.

“You know, the proof of the president's failure is seeing how tepid this economic recovery is. I mean, this administration thinks that the economy's struggling because the stimulus wasn't large enough. The truth is the economy is struggling because the government is too big.”

He suggested it was time to “replace a law professor with a conservative businessman,” a reference to Obama's days as a constitutional law professor at the University of Chicago.

Romney humbly described his past and his father’s successes, saying that he learned how to create jobs through his years in business.

“I had successes and failures,” he said. “Each step of the way I learned more about what it is that makes our American system so powerful. You can't learn that teaching constitution law at University of Chicago. ... You can’t even learn this as a community organizer.”

Romney reused some of his lines from his economic speech at the University of Chicago the night before, joking that the president would not have allowed inventors like the Wright Brothers and Thomas Edison to create their innovations.

“So tonight was the primary, but November is the general election,” he said. “And we're going to face a defining decision as a people. Our choice will not be about party or even personality. This election will be about principle. Our economic freedom will be on the ballot.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Most Read Articles
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
More Columns »