QUICK TAKE: Paul Focuses on Revolution, Not White House, in Post-Primary Speech

Updated: January 10, 2012 | 9:28 p.m.
January 10, 2012 | 9:21 p.m.

Rep. Ron Paul of Texas, fresh off a surprisingly strong second-place showing in New Hampshire’s primary, focused not on his bid for the White House but on the goals of the libertarian revolution he espouses when he addressed supporters on Tuesday night.

“There is no doubt, there is no doubt that this whole effort that we are involved in will not go unnoticed, let me tell you. I think the intellectual revolution going on now is well on the way. There is no way they are going to stop the momentum that we have started,” Paul said.

Paul said he and his followers were “dangerous to the status quo of this country.”

“That irate minority … it’s growing by leaps and bounds, will continue to grow by leaps and bounds, and we will restore freedom to this country,” he said.

The congressman's victory speech ranged across monetary reform to foreign policy and reigning in government spending, but unlike primary victor Mitt Romney, he did not attack President Obama or his GOP opponents by name.  

“The other candidates are not talking about real [spending] cuts. They’re talking about cutting proposed increases out in ten years,” he said.

One reference to a fellow candidate came in the form of a joke.

“I wanted to thank the Union-Leader for not endorsing me,” he said, referring to the New Hampshire newspaper. The paper endorsed Newt Gingrich.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
More Columns »