Paul Ryan Speaks Out After Loss

Updated: November 13, 2012 | 8:26 a.m.
November 13, 2012 | 8:00 a.m.

Rep. Paul Ryan (Chet Susslin)

Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., spoke out for the first time following the Republican presidential ticket’s loss last Tuesday in an interview with his local Milwaukee Journal Sentinel newspaper, saying he was shocked on Election Night.

Recognizing that President Obama “won fair and square,” he described the scene watching the returns come in with the Romneys in a Boston hotel, calling it “pretty sad.”

“We were with the Romneys when we knew it was over,” he said in the interview. “Our comments more or less revolved around our concern for the country.”

Ryan did win one election on Tuesday: his House race. Though, he won it by his smallest margin yet, 11.5 percentage points. Overall, however, he called the experience of running for vice president positive and said the Romneys treated him “like family members.”

“I know some people have come away with different conclusions on these experiences,” he said. “This is a very net positive experience for us.”

Although giving the president credit for bringing out the votes needed to win, Ryan would not admit that his loss was a failure of policy.

“Well, he got turnout,” Ryan said. “The president should get credit for achieving record-breaking turnout numbers from urban areas for the most part, and that did win the election for him.”

Continuing, he said: “It’s clear we have a country that is divided among a number of issues. We thought that the best thing for the country is to get ahead of our fiscal problems. We offered specific solutions. It didn't go our way. So obviously we're disappointed by that. We're not going to be able to fix this country's fiscal problems along the way I thought we should have. Whether people intended it or not, we've got divided government.”

Ryan said that the divided government of the last two years did not work and that the two parties are going to have to work together better to solve problems, specifically the national debt.

“I guess the shock that we felt that evening, a shock to where the country is headed,” he said.

He declined to answer questions about his potential involvement in the presidential contest in 2016, saying the country was a tired of politics after the election.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

1:57 p.m.
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »