CAMPAIGN 2012

New Romney Ad Escalates Welfare Attack on Obama

Updated: August 20, 2012 | 7:13 a.m.
August 20, 2012 | 6:29 a.m.



Mitt Romney’s campaign on Monday escalated its attack on President Obama’s welfare policy, releasing a new TV ad that cites a Richmond Times-Dispatch editorial that alleges the president is trying to end work requirements for welfare and calls that decision “nuts.”

“One of the most respected newspapers in America called it ‘nuts,’ saying, ‘If you want to get more people to work, you don’t loosen the requirements – you tighten them,” a voiceover says.

The ad alleges that Obama “quietly” ended work requirements for welfare, effectively “gutting” former President Bill Clinton’s 1996 bipartisan welfare reform bill. The ad is referring to a memo from Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius informing states that the administration was willing to waive federal work requirements if the state welfare programs could come up with their own plans to improve employment outcomes.

The ad is the third spot the Romney campaign and the Republican National Committee have released on welfare in recent weeks. The line of attack started with a spot using Clinton and his 1996 welfare reform bill to attack Obama’s work on the issue, and continued with an ad showing a clip of Obama from 1998 saying that he was not a “supporter of the federal plan that was signed in 1996.”

The Obama campaign has responded to the attacks as “blatantly false” and “a complete and utter lie.” Clinton himself has called out the ad campaign as “not true.”

The ad fails to mention that as governor of Massachusetts, Romney signed a 2005 letter from the Republican Governor’s Association to congressional leadership touting the benefits a waiver program – similar to Obama’s – would bring their states.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Major Garrett: All Powers

Obama Pushes to Accommodate, Not Protect, Freedom of the Press

May 21, 2013
The Justice Department’s secret subpoena of AP phone logs begs questions about Obama’s attitude toward the First Amendment and government scrutiny.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

Republicans’ Hatred of Obama Blinds Them to Public Disinterest in Scandals

May 20, 2013
Republicans are so focused on their bitter battles against Obama, they can’t see how little impact the “scandals” have had on public opinion.
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
More Columns »