Lew: Health Care Law Not a Tax, 'It's a Penalty'

Updated: July 1, 2012 | 12:04 p.m.
July 1, 2012 | 9:56 a.m.

White House Chief of Staff Jack Lew made it clear on Sunday that the White House doesn't yet have an argument to counter the main Republican attack on President Obama's health care law.

Though the law was upheld by the Supreme Court on Thursday in an affirmation of the president's centerpiece legislation, the Court did so under Congress' power to tax, indicating the penalty imposed upon those who don't buy health care can be considered a tax. That's offered Republicans an opening on an issue that Democrats wish would have ended with the SCOTUS decision last week.

But Lew offered little defense of that aspect of the law, asserting only that, in name, it's not a tax, it's a "penalty."

"The law is clear. It's called a penalty. Second of all, what the Supreme Court ruled is that this law is constitutional," he said on CNN's State of the Union.

Lew went so far as to say that the Supreme Court justices didn't call the penalty a tax, but that they did say Congress  "was using a power under the Constitution that permits it" -- the aforementioned congressional power to tax.

"It was not labeled," he said.

He did, however, defend what he called a "penalty" as likely to affect only roughly 1 percent of Americans, according to the Congressional Budget Office. And though Democratic attempts to tie Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney to the Massachusetts health care plan he instituted during his time as governor that is near-identical to Obama's healthcare reform have fallen to the wayside, Lew indicated that argument may see a renaissance following the Supreme Court's decision.

"This was a plan that Governor Romney supported. It's something that I would think he would have been proud of," he said.

The Republican National Committee pounced on Lew's assertions. RNC spokesman Joe Pounder said in an e-mail to reporters that it was "painful" to watch Lew "struggle to explain" how the mandate didn't constitute a tax. The Democratic National Committee countered by arguing that in 2009, Romney wrote in a USA Today op-ed that he used “tax penalties” to achieve the objective of broadening coverage.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »