CAMPAIGN 2012

GOP Candidates Affirm Opposition to Abortion at Forum

Gingrich, Paul, Santorum, and Perry take shots at the court system -- and at Mitt Romney.

Updated: January 18, 2012 | 10:24 p.m.
January 18, 2012 | 10:07 p.m.

GREENVILLE, S.C. – Planned Parenthood, the courts, and Mitt Romney all came under attack on Wednesday from four GOP presidential contenders who spoke at a forum organized by Personhood USA, a national antiabortion group.

Texas Gov. Rick Perry, former House Speaker Newt Gingrich, former Sen. Rick Santorum, R-Pa., and Rep. Ron Paul, R-Texas, who appeared via a live satellite feed, all affirmed their commitment to the antiabortion cause. Perry and Gingrich also took a few shots at Romney, the only candidate not in attendance, for his famously fluid views on the issue.

Organizers said the Romney campaign backed out because of a scheduling conflict and that a scheduling conflict also prevented the former Massachusetts governor from attending a similar event earlier in the year in Iowa.

Perry touted his credentials as an antiabortion governor who defunded Planned Parenthood in his state and was behind parental notification measures, as well as a state law requiring a woman to see a sonogram before being able to obtain an abortion. He said that as president, he would veto any bill that allocated funds to Planned Parenthood, even it meant striking down legislation that provided for vital government functions.

“I’ve been around this business long enough to understand the horse-trading that goes on, but there’s some principles that you don’t trade on,” Perry said.

On Romney’s change of heart on the issue, Perry said he found it unbelievable that the former Massachusetts governor became antiabortion in his 50s. “It is clear to most of us that this was a choice for convenience,” he said.

Gingrich also took aim at Romney for the health care bill he passed in Massachusetts, which allocated state funds for abortion clinics. The bulk of his remarks, however, focused on what has been one of his favorite punching bags throughout his presidential campaign: the courts.

“The president interprets the Constitution as president,” Gingrich said. “If the court makes a fundamentally wrong decision, the president can in fact ignore the courts.”

Santorum, the candidate best-known for his strongly conservative views on both abortion and gay marriage, called abortion “an indispensable moral issue” and called for a president who would continue to talk about it past primary season. He tied the origins of Planned Parenthood to the eugenics movement, and, as he does frequently on the stump, related the issue to his three-year-old daughter, who has a severe genetic condition.

“Every child has dignity and value,” Santorum said. “I’m the blessed father of a special-needs child, which is the greatest gift I’ve been given in my life.”

Santorum said he too would veto legislation funding Planned Parenthood and said he would fight the courts when he believed they erred on fundamental issues.

Paul earned the most boisterous applause of the evening, speaking of his experience as an OB-GYN and how the invention of the sonogram dramatically changed the way women made decisions regarding abortion.

Paul said he is in favor of a constitutional amendment — worded to his liking — banning abortion and changing the makeup of the courts. In the meantime, Paul advocated handing power back over the states by backing a bill that would get rid of the federal jurisdiction of the courts on abortion-related matters.

“It repeals Roe v. Wade immediately,” Paul said. “It would’ve saved a lot of lives a lot sooner.”

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »