CAMPAIGN 2012

Gingrich Praises Ryan’s New Medicare Proposal

Former House speaker’s comments give him political cover after blasting Ryan’s budget as “right-wing social engineering.”

Updated: December 15, 2011 | 5:27 p.m.
December 15, 2011 | 5:26 p.m.

FORT DODGE, Iowa – Newt Gingrich is generously praising a new bipartisan proposal to tackle the rising cost of Medicare developed by Rep. Paul Ryan –- the same Republican whom Gingrich accused earlier this year of “right-wing social engineering” in response to Ryan’s budget plan.

Gingrich encountered substantial criticism after his comments on the Ryan budget, and eventually walked them back, though Mitt Romney has continued to bash Gingrich for his comments. His positive response to the Medicare plan provides him with political cover for any conservatives who haven't forgotten his earlier remarks.

The proposal from Ryan and Senate Finance Committee member Ron Wyden, D-Ore., would have private insurance companies competing directly with Medicare, giving seniors their choice of plans. If the proposal fails to hold Medicare spending to a very tight budget target, Congress would vote on where to cut payments – from doctors, hospitals, or drug companies. That’s the same menu of options Congress currently faces.

“I was delighted this morning to see that Democratic Senator Ron Wyden and GOP Congressman Paul Ryan have come together to try to develop a bipartisan approach to saving Medicare in a way that actually increases choices and increases the opportunity for younger people to have a stable system that’s both affordable and gives them a range of choices,” Gingrich said.

He echoed those comments in an interview with the Des Moines Register in which he said he hopes the plan is a way of “breaking up the logjam.”

On another subject, Gingrich blasted Attorney General Eric Holder for announcing this week that the Justice Department would be aggressive in reviewing new voting laws that civil-rights advocates say will dampen minority participation in next year’s elections.

“I’m very confused on Attorney General Holder on a couple of grounds,” Gingrich said. “I think having some requirement that you be able to identify that you are who you say you are before you vote is a totally reasonable thing.… I think if you look up the places that have the most voter theft and the most voter fraud, I don’t see any justification for saying we shouldn’t know for sure that you are an American citizen and that you are legally alive and that you’re supposed to be allowed to vote. And I think voter fraud in some constituencies is a very big problem.”  

 

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Charlie Cook: The Cook Report

Republicans Should Go Easy on Obama, At Least in Public

May 16, 2013
As a tactical matter, a subterranean campaign will score more direct hits on the president.
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

How the White House Scandals Could Hurt Republicans, Too

May 16, 2013
By enraging the base and strengthening the faction least willing to compromise with Obama, the IRS and Benghazi affairs could hurt a GOP shot at the presidency.
Norm Ornstein: Washington Inside Out

Eric Cantor’s Caucus Thwarts His Push for an Alternative Agenda

May 16, 2013
Cantor has learned that the tea-party movement he helped foster won’t fall in line behind his efforts to push an alternative conservative agenda.
More Columns »