DEBATES

CHART: Obama Blinks 1,000 More Times Than Romney During Debate

Updated: May 30, 2013 | 12:01 a.m.
October 6, 2012 | 12:31 p.m.

President Barack Obama, right, listens to Republican presidential nominee Mitt Romney during the first presidential debate at the University of Denver, Wednesday, Oct. 3, 2012, in Denver. (AP Photo/David Goldman)

From his stilted speech to his downcast expression, President Obama looked uncomfortable on the debate stage Wednesday night. But can we prove, scientifically, that he felt more uncomfortable than Mitt Romney? Perhaps.

Internal agitation can manifest itself as external fidgetiness, and as researchers at the University of Minnesota's Smart Politics found, Obama was particularly fidgety in one area: his eyes.


The president blinked 1,000 times more than his challenger, peaking his max blinks per minutes at 88.8 when he attacked Romney on taxes.  

"This non-verbal cue conforms with several observations that have been made about the president's performance on Wednesday," stated the press release on the findings, "such as the frequent 'umms' and 'ahhs' he uttered during the debate -- as he seemingly struggled to get his bearings and formulate his arguments against Romney who appeared much more focused."

Relative to the average blinking rate of 20 to 25 eye flickers per minute, Romney was agitated as well, blinking nearly double that. However, the researchers indicate that the elevated rates for both candidates could be due to the bright lights of the debate stage.

The record low-blinking rate for a debate as recorded by Smart Politics? That belongs to Texas Gov. Rick Perry, who, in a January GOP primary debate, blinked at a glacial 15.9 times per minutes.

Get the latest news and analysis delivered to your inbox. Sign up for National Journal's morning alert, Wake-Up Call, and afternoon newsletter, The Edge. Subscribe here.


Leave A Comment
The National Journal Group has the right (but not the obligation) to monitor the comments and to remove any materials it deems inappropriate.
Comments powered by Disqus
Follow National Journal
Related Content
Columns
Josh Kraushaar: Against the Grain

Why Democrats Are Already Jumping Aboard the Hillary Clinton Bandwagon

June 18, 2013
Claire McCaskill's endorsement was a bow to reality: Democrats don't want to challenge Clinton in 2016.
Charlie Cook: Off to the Races

No Guarantee of a GOP Senate Majority

June 17, 2013
The disproportionate exposure for the chamber’s Democrats is very clear. But can Republicans capitalize on their opportunities?
Ronald Brownstein: Political Connections

Why We Lack Good Privacy Guidelines

June 13, 2013
Technology innovations have served to strip away privacy. They could also be the key to restoring it.
More Columns »