Skip Navigation

Close and don't show again.

Your browser is out of date.

You may not get the full experience here on National Journal.

Please upgrade your browser to any of the following supported browsers:

'Obamacare' May Fail Someday, But GOP Is Jumping the Gun 'Obamacare' May Fail Someday, But GOP Is Jumping the Gun

This ad will end in seconds
Close X

Not a member? Learn More »

Forget Your Password?

Don't have an account? Register »

Reveal Navigation


The Trail: 2012 Presidential News from the Field / ANALYSIS

'Obamacare' May Fail Someday, But GOP Is Jumping the Gun

A 19th century law argued at the Supreme Court spotlights the prematurity of the GOP claim that the health care law has failed.

Republican Presidential candidate Rick Santorum speaks in front of the Supreme Court about repealing the Affordable Care Act, a health care law being argued today. (Chet Susslin)

photo of Jill Lawrence
March 26, 2012

Leave it to a 19th century law to highlight the spuriousness of Republican arguments that “Obamacare” has failed.

The first topic to come up in oral arguments on Monday at the start of the Supreme Court's historic three-day health care marathon was whether anyone has standing to challenge a new requirement that most individuals buy health insurance coverage -- or pay a penalty. As attorney Robert Long told the justices, the 1867 Anti-Injunction Act imposes a “pay first, litigate later” requirement. So what’s the problem? The first penalties under the Affordable Care Act won’t be imposed until 2015.

(RELATEDWhich Justices Asked Which Questions?)


However the justices rule on the question, its moment under the high court's microscope is a reminder that the law Republicans have already deemed a failure is in its infancy and its major provisions won’t be in place until 2014.

The Supreme Court arguments and the law’s second anniversary last Friday triggered a new round of GOP attacks along those lines. “President Obama wanted health care to be his signature issue,” Republican National Committee Chairman Reince Priebus wrote last week. “Today, it is an undeniable failure.”

“This presidency has been a failure. At the centerpiece of this failure is this piece of legislation,” Mitt Romney said Friday at a repeal-and-replace event in Metairie, La. Rick Santorum aimed a double-barreled email attack Sunday at both "Obamacare" and Romney’s signature health care law in Massachusetts. "It didn't take long for people in Massachusetts to realize Romneycare was a failure and it is already proving to be the same on the national level. That's why I vow to repeal and replace Obamacare," Santorum said.

(RELATED: Poll: Public Still Against Mandate)

Republican strategist Ed Rogers, meanwhile, wrote Thursday in The Washington Post that “Obama is failing on energy and health care.” His evidence: "The total cost of health care has risen 21 percent since Obama got elected, while inflation has only risen 7.26 percent. The average cost of health care for employees has increased 28 percent, and the average cost for employers has increased 19 percent. 

“He claims health care as his trophy success for his first term. Wasn’t he supposed to rein in costs, or is that another Obama policy that’s working perfectly according to plan, it just hasn’t been given enough time to have any discernible positive effect?” Rogers asked.

There have been and will be problems with the complex and far-reaching Affordable Care Act – a long-term disability insurance program already has been scrapped and states have demanded and won more flexibility on what insurance policies they offer in online marketplaces called exchanges, to name two. But the Republican complaints are premature at best, misleading at worst.

(RELATED: Cook: I'm Skeptical Ruling Will Affect Election)

For a start, the authors of the study that shows the total cost of health care has risen 21 percent since Obama was elected – a Towers Watson survey of 512 companies that spent $87 billion on health care in 2011 -- also say that “over the last five years, we have witnessed the longest period of stability in health care cost increases since this survey began in 1995.”

The Obama administration points to the federal government’s new authority to review and put a spotlight on requested insurance rate hikes over 10 percent. It also brags about lower premiums for Medicare Advantage, the private plans available as alternatives to traditional Medicare.

The exchanges, similar to what Republicans have proposed for Medicare recipients, will be available to small businesses and uninsured individuals starting in 2014. The idea, the same as a Medicare plan proposed by conservative Rep. Paul Ryan, R-Wis., is that the marketplace will foster competition and drive down costs. But of course, that can’t happen until the exchanges are up and running.

(RELATED: Crowds Gather in Protest Outside Court)

Another cost-cutting approach is scheduled to begin in 2015 when a new Independent Payment Advisory Board can start recommending ways to curb the growth of Medicare costs. As of this year, the government is tracking readmission rates at hospitals and charging penalties to hospitals with the highest rates.

Next year, Medicare will test plans to pay a single “bundled” fee for an operation, instead of separate charges for every doctor, test, and medication. The law sets up many other pilot programs aimed at cutting costs, including home-based care for the chronically ill, transitional care for people leaving hospitals, penalizing hospitals with high infection rates, and offering hospice services along with aggressive treatment (giving patients both could reduce costs and at the same time prolong life, research shows).

The bottom line is, it’s way too soon to say whether any of these experiments will fail, or succeed and spread and change the health sector on a large scale.

As for “Romneycare,” the Santorum campaign is basing its claim of failure on a 2008 study by the libertarian Cato Institute. Massachusetts leads the nation in coverage – more than 98 percent of its residents have insurance. A survey of the state in June found 63 percent approved of the law, while only 21 percent opposed it. The initial law did not deal with rising costs, but the state is tackling them now with experiments that look a lot like what’s in the Affordable Care Act.

If the authors of the 906-page Affordable Care Act had left out the cost-cutting components, it would have been a much shorter and less complicated law. But that would have made it an even easier target for the GOP than the current law, with its years of phase-ins during which critics are free to carp before anyone knows if they are right or not.

More The Trail: 2012 Presidential News from the Field
Job Board
Search Jobs
Biomedical Service Internship Position
American Society of Civil Engineers | Flint, MI
Fire Sprinkler Inspector
American Society of Civil Engineers | Charlotte, NC
Professional Development Program Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Farmington Hills, MI
Deputy Director of Transit Operations
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Jose, CA
Transportation Planner
American Society of Civil Engineers | Salinas, CA
Assistant Professor - Water Resources/Ecological Engineering
American Society of Civil Engineers | Auburn, AL
Product Manager - Chemical Development and Supply - Tulsa, OK
American Society of Civil Engineers | Tulsa, OK
Commissioning Intern
American Society of Civil Engineers | Chicago, IL
Assessment and Remediation Team Lead
American Society of Civil Engineers | Regina, SK
Business Development Manager
American Society of Civil Engineers
Sr. Controls Systems Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Grand Island, NE
Senior Project Manager- Transportation
American Society of Civil Engineers | San Antonio, TX
Materials Engineer 2
American Society of Civil Engineers | IL
Land Surveyor
American Society of Civil Engineers
Quality Engineer
American Society of Civil Engineers | Attica, IN
comments powered by Disqus